At
several points in my life I have tried living in places other than
the Midwest. I spent two dreadful adolescent years in New Jersey
surrounded by the future junk bond traders and real estate agents
of America. During my high school years, I lived in Columbia, Maryland,
a planned community that had no sense of community whatsoever, a
place without a center and without sidewalks. I came back to Ann
Arbor for college, but afterward got a job that allowed me to travel
the country, from Coral Springs, Florida, which I loathed, to Thousand
Oaks, California, which I merely disliked. My wife and I moved to
Boston after we were married, but the people talked too quickly,
the roads were too confusing, and the “history” a little
too precious. We also lived in Maine, but never got used to sunrises
at 3:00 a.m. and never got over the feeling (nor were allowed to
forget by the Maine natives we knew) that we were tourists passing
through—perhaps a self-fulfilling judgment, because after
less than a year there we returned home (it was always home) to
Michigan, and here we have stayed.
Thus I have
come to think of the Midwest, and the ways it makes me comfortable,
not so much on its own terms as in how it differs from places I
have liked less. As I write this on a night in early spring with
the snow falling outside my window, it occurs to me that the Midwest
may be the kind of place that can only be truly appreciated in negative
terms. It’s not too hot, for example, or too dry; it’s
also not arctically cold more than two or three days out of the
year. It’s not overdeveloped in most places, but also not
stagnant in spite of its Rust Belt reputation. People aren’t
unwelcoming, but neither are they aggressively polite.
For someone coming from, say, Los Angeles to Michigan, such recommendations
may seem pathetic. Such a person would look at Michigan and see
a state full of run-down small towns and massive college football
stadiums, unnaturally uniform corn fields and lifeless industrial
dystopias, rutted dirt roads and pothole-riddled multilane highways.
He or she would certainly note the extraordinary level of racial
segregation, even in the “liberal” Ann Arbor area; he
or she could take one look at Jackson and understand why it was
the self-proclaimed “Birthplace of the Republican Party.”
So there would be much to criticize—and what could a good
Michigander like myself say in response? “I like the seasons”?
“Top of the Park is cool”? Maybe brag about all the
fresh water we have?
My inability
to positively assert what I like about Michigan, where I’ve
spent the majority of my life, may derive in large part from its
familiarity. It’s hard to really see something you’ve
looked at every day since childhood, which is why so many writers
find they must leave the places they call home in order to write
about them. It is also why we need writers and artists in the first
place—to reintroduce us to the strange particularity of our
everyday surroundings. Unfortunately, the Midwest, despite being
a great source of writers in particular (including most of the American
literary giants of the 20th century from Hemingway to Morrison),
has rarely been a great source of material for those writers except
as metaphors employed in the cause of sentimentality or ridicule.
Thornton Wilder’s “Our Town” cemented the myth
of heartland cherry-pie Americana; on the flip side, Jay Gatsby’s
fatal flaw was his small-town Midwestern-ness, his belief in decency
and romance, which F. Scott Fitzgerald portrayed as both tragic
and foolish. Meanwhile, novelists have rarely had anything kind
to say about the great industrial cities of Detroit, Chicago and
Cleveland, although in the popular imagination, and to a great degree
in fact, those places were the engines that made America’s
current hyperpower status possible. Our unwillingness to allow (for
example) the outdated American steel industry to die in the early
21st century attests to our collective nostalgia for the time when
American factories supplied the world.
In the kind
of cultural feedback loop we’ve all grown accustomed to in
recent years, many Midwesterners adopted such conceptions about
themselves and the places they lived with earnest enthusiasm. My
grandfather, who worked for decades in the factory town of Fort
Wayne, Indiana, noted with pride that Fort Wayne had been number
seven on Hitler’s list of American cities to bomb because
of its contributions to the American military machine. My mother’s
favorite musical as a young woman was The Music Man, with its famous
song about Gary, Indiana. And I’ll admit I’m a sucker
for George Bailey and his beautiful old Bedford Falls; I’ve
occasionally fantasized about running along Main Street in Chelsea
and yelling, “Hello, Seitz’s Tavern! Hello, Jiffy Mix
plant!”
But little of
that mythic Midwest still exists today, except in pockets like Chelsea
which have been propped up by Ann Arbor money. Most small towns
in Michigan are either in decline or turning to tourism to boost
their economies; small farms are being carved into generic subdivisions;
the schools, once among the nation’s finest, are in steep
decline; the bridges are crumbling; the roads are pitted and scarred.
Detroit, meanwhile, is reminiscent of Macchu Picchu or Easter Island,
a place where giants once walked the Earth and then vanished, leaving
behind only their awe-inspiring ruins. Such a cultural landscape
can be no one’s idea of heartland America. For those of us
who call it home, who have an inability to be quite satisfied anywhere
else, it’s time we began taking a closer, deeper look at the
place we think we know so well. A2P
Email deepbackground@annarborpaper.com |
|