I
realized earlier today that a friend of mine has been seeing a girl
for a few months now and I have no idea what her name is. It’s
not that I have a particularly bad memory, in fact, I tend to remember
most things I hear. It is that he has never once mentioned
it to me. She is always referred to as “The girl I’ve
been hanging out with,” “The girl I’ve been hooking
up with,” or, when time is scarce “that girl.”
It makes me wonder how long it will take before he refers to her
by name, let alone admit that they are actually dating. At this
point I refuse to ask, because I’m curious as to how long
he can keep her at arm’s length. The last conversation
we had about her went like this:
“So
what’s going on with the girl you’re dating?”
“Not
really dating...”
“Is
that why you spend all of your free time with this girl and make
out with her whenever you can? Does
she KNOW you’re not dating?”
“I
mean...”
“You’re
stupid.”
Another
fine example of the commitment-wary man in a great deal of discomfort
is the “gift-contingent special occasion.” One
otherwise kind young man was discussing at the office today how
he had only just started spending time with a great girl when her
birthday had come up. He worked himself up into an indecisive
frenzy about what to buy her. Something thoughtful or expensive
would indicate to her that they were officially dating, while a
casual gift might risk seeming offensive and drive her away. Rather
than muddle through the decision and the inevitable pigeonholing
or loneliness to follow, he simply stopped calling her.
The
lack of clear definitions and boundaries in the development of the
modern romantic relationship must have something to do with dating
culture’s metamorphosis into “hang out and hook up”
culture. For the most part, young people don’t go out
on a series of dates any more; instead they casually hang out for
an indefinite period until they don’t want to hook up any
more. If they keep hooking up for a substantial amount of time,
then phase into exclusivity, they may very well be dating. After
dating for enough time to feel comfortable letting everyone know
they’re definitely taken, the pair becomes boyfriend-girlfriend.
I
do understand, of course, the desire not to rush into any situation
in which more is expected that one is willing to give. I realize
I am capable of being more of a commitmentphobe than most. I
had been in my last real relationship for eight months before I
started referring to him as my “(gulp) boyfriend.” And
I suppose, technically, that the last guy I was seeing had been
in my life for about a year. Not only would I never have referred
to us as “dating,” but he never even made it into my
cell phone. Perhaps our generation’s widespread refusal
to commit to the word “dating” stems from a pervading
fear of being hurt or abandoned. After all, to many, including
myself, it is much easier to dismiss the significance of a relationship
than it is to assert that it has a future and then learn that the
other party disagrees.
Rather
than having awkward ill-timed chats about where a relationship is
“going,” the emotionally protective find out where we
stand in someone else’s life by observing where we stand with
his or her friends. I recently heard the clearest example of
this from a girl who has been hanging out with a foolhardy young
man whose friends have nicknames for all of the girls he’s
dated: Bottle Blondie, Cruella, Hot Jane, Double D and Nutcase,
all reflecting what, exactly, they found pertinent. She asked him
one day why they didn’t simply refer to them by their given
names, and he said it was a practice of his childhood friends to
come up with code names for girls they were talking about. He mentioned,
for example, a friend of his who had been dating a girl that resembled
a zaftig Christina Aguilera, who his friends called “Chubby
Chris.”
“What
do your friends call me?” she asked, curious now.
“You’re
going to be pissed.”
“No
no, just tell me.”
“Retarded
Brooke Shields.
Ow.
A2P
Email
girl@annarborpaper.com.
|