Cinebitch
by Laura Abraham

Dear Cinebitch,

“Epic” movies seem to be quite the trend these days with The Matrix, Lord of the Rings, Kill Bill etc. Is the serializing of stories going to be a growing trend? If so , is it because people are telling longer stories or are the movie makers taking time to tell a story more completely? What’s the deal??? Will they be allowing for intermissions soon so we can pee??

Anonymous

Sweet, sweet Anonymous,

I have to admit I was a bit confused by your question. It seems to me you may think epic films and serialized films are one in the same. They are not. Epic films often times take a historical event or mythic figure and add some awesome costumes and HUGE sets to create an entire world for the audience to drink in. They do not necessarily have to be more than one film. Classic examples of epic films include Ben Hur and Gone with the Wind which were only one film, as we all know. The serialized film CAN be an epic but does not have to be. Lord of the Rings is obviously an epic film as well as a series, but is Harry Potter? I say no, Harry Potter is only a series.

Oh my god!!!!!!!! I have made myself dizzy from this conversation. I feel like I am nothing more than a circle talker, like my grandmother. Once I asked her if she had seen my dad lately and she replied, “I haven’t seen him since the last time I saw him.” I was like, wha? And then I kicked her out of my car for not making sense. I had had enough!
I do think the “epic” film and the serializing of stories is going to continue for a while. When Hollywood smells a winner, they sink their overly bleached carrion teeth in and don’t let go until it turns rancid. Look at the ‘70s, when they moved from epic films to more “real” films about everyday people with directors like Scorsese and Coppola. When the bosses saw the cash these films made them they couldn’t get enough. They held tight to this formula for over 25 years until we started seeing the epic film sneak its way back into the cinemas in this country.

My friend at Colombia College, Del Harvey, agrees with me: “When a film company can sell an audience on the concept of a “franchise” film, they can see a big ol’ crop of Mama Dollars and Papa Dollars lying in future harvest for years to come.  This trend was most recently started by Star Wars and The Godfather.  Which is why Coppola is the smartest of the Big Three directors to come out of the ‘70s; he pulled the plug on his franchise after picture number three. Lucas has done six in a row, and they’re getting worse every time.  Spielberg allowed the studio to do Jaws four and maybe even five, who the hell knows for sure?”
Another friend, Mark Maynard (of Crimewave and Power Monkey Trio fame, as well as his own over-inflated sense of self) says, “Follow the money... The trend for sequels has been booming for some time, given the fact that they, generally speaking, have built-in audiences. There’s no reason to think that serialized films wouldn’t be the same. There’s more risk, though. If the first one fails... you wouldn’t want to invest in the second and third chapters. It’s a calculated risk. If you’ve got what you think might make a good serial, why not announce it as such from the beginning?” I think this is hilarious since not one of Mark’s projects has ever made him one American dollar. In fact, I doubt he even knows what “follow the money” means.

Jeff, a gentle yet sarcastic soul who works with me, told me he believes epic fantasy movies are more popular nowadays because the world sucks. With all the sad things in the world people just want to drop some cash to escape from the pain of living. Jeff is sweet and cute and I love him. I think there is something to his theory and so I tickled him when he said it. That is the Cinebitch way so you might want to think twice before you say anything cute in front of me.

The lovely Linette Lao of Ypsilanti is more like me when she says, “I don’t know what to say. I have no interest in any movie that’s not a self-contained story in one movie going session. I have a tiny attention span maybe, but I also think as a moviegoer, I’ve committed $9 and a certain number of  hours, no more than 2 and a half, and the filmmaker should deliver the movie in that time! I’m also confused—what is a sequel? Versus a serial? Sequels are more acceptable to me than serialized movies, but I never expect them to be good. So I avoid both. I haven’t seen any of those movies in the question. I had fun at the bar with you!” Ok, I added that last part so you guys would believe I don’t actually drink alone at bars. People really do enjoy my company, I swear.

I cannot sit through a long-winded film like the Lord of the Rings movie in the theater but I can watch it on DVD with about 450 breaks in the middle. I am sure it is a decent film but the sitting with strangers for that long just gives me hives.

Sugar lips Anonymous, I hope this was helpful. Well, honestly I don’t give a shit if it was or not because that’s how I am. Hope the world is sunny and happy for my Cinebitch readers. Thank you for tuning in.

Love?
Laurita

 

 

P.S. Send me questions right now! I am sick of asking! Don’t make me come to your homes.

email cinebitch@annarborpaper.com

INTERVIEWS
25 Suaves
Sufjan Stevens
DJ Graffiti
Dykehouse

MUSIC
10 Local Bands You Need To See
Rock Photography of Doug Coombe
The Bluegrass Festival
Great Music Rip-offs
Tony Rice
Not-Guilty Pleasures
Mastodon

COLUMNS
Cinebitch: of Epic Proportions
Deep Background:
Of Greenpeace and Hustlers
Girl on Love: The Male Brain
the Manny Diaries: In Perfect Harmony
Politics and You:
Presidential Daily Briefings
Watch Me Now: The Band That Would Be King
Quidnunc: gossip

REVIEWS
music: The Von Bondies
music: Pas/Cal
music: Brandon Wiard
music: The twilight Babies
film: Dogville

PLUS:
PublicEye You Belong to the City. You Belong to the Night.(photos)